Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:39
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What's a band that is really popular that you don't like? Why?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why did the Soviet Jews hate the Soviet Union?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why do Trump supporters like Andrew and Tristan Tate?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Who would win, an F-22 Raptor or Tie Defender?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Pope Leo XIV Dons White Sox Hat During Public General Audience in Vatican - Sports Illustrated
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Have you ever witnessed a remote beach show where hundreds of turtles crawling to the water?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Eight killed after hot air balloon catches fire, crashes in Brazil - Al Jazeera